This page was designed to be viewed with a browser that supports Cascading Style Sheets [CSS] and if you are using earlier versions [pre- ver.5.0] of Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator,you are missing out on a pleasant viewing experience. It is best that you upgrade your browser soon as most of the sites will increasingly make use of CSS.

 gniLogo GoodNewsIndia ::Supplement

If all is wrong with India, how come it's been around 5000 years? ©

Prev: Bird Flu: the scare and some sense  |  Next: Approaches to a water economy

Page: 1 2 >
Activism

Oct 29, 2005
Mumbai mill lands, retrieved for the people

The Bombay High Court’s recent judgment on the sale of mill lands in that city is yet another display of Indian democracy’s robustness. Most of the times, the executive plays rings around citizens and they despair and give up. But when all seems lost, along come a few lone warriors. They group themselves and mount a seemingly impossible counter-attack on powerful interests. Then judges as on Oct 17, speak out some plain truth and call the bluff of authorities feigning child like innocence. The confrontation does not quiet end there. But in the next round, culprits are a little wiser, more chastened and hopefully better behaved. By such small progress is democracy strengthened.

Mumbai was a profitable manufacturing centre until independence with prime land occupied by docks, engineering works and textile mills. Some 600 acres in central Mumbai belonged to several textile mills. Over time, profitability of these mills diminished and owners began to covet opportunities in real estate development. An ill-managed textile workers’ strike in the 80s and the advent of economic reforms in 1991, set the stage for re-zoning mill lands.

Socialist orthodoxy does not keel over and surrender to market forces all at once. It creeps up there in stages. So a ‘good-on-paper’ policy was formulated in 1991 as a new Development Control Regulation [DCR]. By Rule 58 of this DCR, some 600 acres of mill lands could be sold, provided a third was reserved for public use [like parks and play grounds], a third for affordable housing and a third for owners to develop as they pleased.

With citizens lulled into thinking their interests had been safe-guarded by DCR, the Maharashtra Government perpetrated its act of stealth in 2001: it amended Rule 58 of the DCR to read that the three way share applied only to “open lands” and not the whole land. This simple sleight of hand reduced the land available for public spaces -parks, pedestrian malls, boulevards etc- from 200 acres to just 20. MCGM [Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, which was entitled to a third of the land to develop as public spaces] and MHADA [Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority to which was due another third for affordable house building] maintained deafening silences.

Page: 1 2 >

HOME
Directories:: MagazineSupplementsBackstage
Print:: Text & ImagesText only

Send This Story To Friends

Print




GNI Mailing List
Sign UpLeave

Articles by category: ALL  Appeal  Activism  Economy  Elsewhere  Energy  Enthusiast  Environment  Governance  Ideas For India  Initiative  Innovation  Memory Speaks  Newsclip  Profile  Reforms  Resources  Sciences  Springs  Trend  Update  Water 

Write to GoodNewsIndia


 Shop at Amazon::Support GNI 

Internet Explorer distorts many of the styling features of this site. Switch to Firefox